С. В. Сахневич Friedrich Nietzsche’s works possess a tremendous motivational power, capable of instantly changing the trajectory of an individual or even an entire community. However, this value can be undermined by a number of contradictions that reduce the average reader’s trust in his writings – a reader accustomed to treating stability and consistency of a philosopher’s views (and of a person in general) as a litmus test of their significance and reliability. Therefore, in order not to alienate but to broaden Nietzsche’s readership, we deem it necessary to find a point of support that would allow us to interpret the essence of these contradictions; this is the aim of our article. If the primary discourse of Nietzsche will serve as the source for identifying contradictions, then a fundamentally new starting position that would permit the unfolding of a unified structure of the subject matter – and in which all contradictions can be presented as a system of aporias linked into a whole – will be the metatext, because it is the locus where the author exercises less control over his narratives, being relaxed and at ease. The methodology will be the deconstruction of the text. The outcome of the article may become a coherent network of Nietzsche’s interrelated «fault lines», each documented through lemmas and patterns, whereby the reader receives not an oversimplified dogma but a transparent map of contradictions and paths for their interpretation, thereby increasing trust and expanding the audience willing to engage in dialogue with the text.
Научная статья 
нормативный догматизм читателя
Nietzsche’s discourse as a source of aporias
Nietzsche’s metatext as a methodological key for the deconstruction and synthesis of aporias
normative dogmatism of the reader
деконструкция
дискурс Ницше как источник апорий
метатекст Ницше как методологический ключ для деконструкции и синтеза противоречий в апории